Denise Richards is turning in to a nutcase. Her latest allegations are outrageous and very dangerous…especially to her children.
More pictures after the skip…
The details of last weeks emergency hearing brought on by Denise Richards are being released. Something – not sure what yet - prompted Denise to think that Charlie had molested their daughters in some way. I guess there are more ways to molest a child than physical, because lawyers claimed it wasn’t physical molestation they were worried about.
Isn’t that what molestation is? Charlie is said to be furious, even though the judge threw out Denise’s request for custody change. The judge appears to be fed up over the tug of war with the two also. Do you think there was a basis for Denise’s claim or is she seeking ratings for her show?
Photos: PR Photos
One Response to “Explosive: Denise Richards Accuses Charlie Sheen of Molestation”
We'd love to hear your comment but please don't spam, we reserve the right to delete anything which is inappropriate
One out of every three-five children will be sexually abused by the age of 18; half by their biological fathers. The statisics are based on scientific evidence in the empirical literature. There is not always physical evidence of molestation for obvious reasons, but often psychological evidence revealed in “acting out” behaviors and a variety of other FORENSIC tests that DO NOT involve leading questions. Unless you are FORENSIC expert, you have no expertise to make any comments about whether or not Denise is a boldfaced liar or Sheen an abuser. There is a myth about protective mothers and parents, that they are somehow coming from a vengeful place. The majority of them are not when you research the empirical literature. Since I am not an expert in this case, it is not for me to say whether or not Sheen abused his daughters; however, the empirical literature and his behaviors in general (e.g., sex addictions, rage, narcissism, explosive and blatantly abusive emails to the mother of his children; etc.) would compel me to scrutizine this case quite closely if I were an expert or judge presiding over the case, especially if the children are exhibiting symptoms that denote sexual abuse (e.g., sexually acting out, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, night-mares, inconsollable tantrums, etc.). Dispel the myth of the “woman scorned” because most mothers are not coming from a vengeful place; although a small percentage are. Further, “inconclusive” or “unsubstantiated” does not mean the abuse did not occur. It simply means there wasn’t enough PHYSICAL evidence, such as torn tissue, to hold up in trial to convict the perp. or to mandate supervised visitation. Also, perhaps it isn’t Denise that went public with the info., but the Papparazzi. Thus, it matters not what YOU believe despite the fact that the allegation may be “unsubstantiated” or “inconclusive.” That does not mean the accusation is FALSE per se.