<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explosive: Denise Richards Accuses Charlie Sheen of Molestation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anythinghollywood.com/2008/07/explosive-denise-richards-accuses-charlie-sheen-of-molestation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anythinghollywood.com/2008/07/explosive-denise-richards-accuses-charlie-sheen-of-molestation/</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip, Hollywood gossip, latest entertainment news, celebrity pictures and videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:17:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://anythinghollywood.com/2008/07/explosive-denise-richards-accuses-charlie-sheen-of-molestation/comment-page-1/#comment-108768</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anythinghollywood.com/?p=6036#comment-108768</guid>
		<description>One out of every three-five children will be sexually abused by the age of 18; half by their biological fathers. The statisics are based on scientific evidence in the empirical literature. There is not always physical evidence of molestation for obvious reasons, but often psychological evidence revealed in &quot;acting out&quot; behaviors and a variety of other FORENSIC tests that DO NOT involve leading questions. Unless you are FORENSIC expert, you have no expertise to make any comments about whether or not Denise is a boldfaced liar or Sheen an abuser. There is a myth about protective mothers and parents, that they are somehow coming from a vengeful place. The majority of them are not when you research the empirical literature. Since I am not an expert in this case, it is not for me to say whether or not Sheen abused his daughters; however, the empirical literature and his behaviors in general (e.g., sex addictions, rage, narcissism, explosive and blatantly abusive emails to the mother of his children; etc.) would compel me to scrutizine this case quite closely if I were an expert or judge presiding over the case, especially if the children are exhibiting symptoms that denote sexual abuse (e.g., sexually acting out, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, night-mares, inconsollable tantrums, etc.). Dispel the myth of the &quot;woman scorned&quot; because most mothers are not coming from a vengeful place; although a small percentage are. Further, &quot;inconclusive&quot; or &quot;unsubstantiated&quot; does not mean the abuse did not occur. It simply means there wasn&#039;t enough PHYSICAL evidence, such as torn tissue, to hold up in trial to convict the perp. or to mandate supervised visitation. Also, perhaps it isn&#039;t Denise that went public with the info., but the Papparazzi. Thus, it matters not what YOU believe despite the fact that the allegation may be &quot;unsubstantiated&quot; or &quot;inconclusive.&quot; That does not mean the accusation is FALSE per se.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One out of every three-five children will be sexually abused by the age of 18; half by their biological fathers. The statisics are based on scientific evidence in the empirical literature. There is not always physical evidence of molestation for obvious reasons, but often psychological evidence revealed in &#8220;acting out&#8221; behaviors and a variety of other FORENSIC tests that DO NOT involve leading questions. Unless you are FORENSIC expert, you have no expertise to make any comments about whether or not Denise is a boldfaced liar or Sheen an abuser. There is a myth about protective mothers and parents, that they are somehow coming from a vengeful place. The majority of them are not when you research the empirical literature. Since I am not an expert in this case, it is not for me to say whether or not Sheen abused his daughters; however, the empirical literature and his behaviors in general (e.g., sex addictions, rage, narcissism, explosive and blatantly abusive emails to the mother of his children; etc.) would compel me to scrutizine this case quite closely if I were an expert or judge presiding over the case, especially if the children are exhibiting symptoms that denote sexual abuse (e.g., sexually acting out, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, night-mares, inconsollable tantrums, etc.). Dispel the myth of the &#8220;woman scorned&#8221; because most mothers are not coming from a vengeful place; although a small percentage are. Further, &#8220;inconclusive&#8221; or &#8220;unsubstantiated&#8221; does not mean the abuse did not occur. It simply means there wasn&#8217;t enough PHYSICAL evidence, such as torn tissue, to hold up in trial to convict the perp. or to mandate supervised visitation. Also, perhaps it isn&#8217;t Denise that went public with the info., but the Papparazzi. Thus, it matters not what YOU believe despite the fact that the allegation may be &#8220;unsubstantiated&#8221; or &#8220;inconclusive.&#8221; That does not mean the accusation is FALSE per se.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.263 seconds -->
