Lisa Rinna’s Playboy cover is disappointing! Lisa has been talking it up for weeks now, saying – or at least heavily hinting – that she was letting a lot show. So, when the cover was released today, it was a surprise at how much she ISN’T showing. But maybe the pages inside are better…?
More pictures of Lisa after the jump…
Hugh Hefner and Playboy usually have pretty sexy covers. After all, its the cover that sells the magazine. And Playboy is hurting right now, so they need to sell covers. But Lisa’s ain’t gonna do it. The cover says, “Are you trying to seduce us, Ms. Rinna? But Dlisted says:
More like “Are you trying to make us barf through our eye sockets, Ms. Rinna?” I really wish Playboy made this a Sans Fards issue. And by “fards,” I mean farty turds, because then 45-year-old Lisa Rinna would never have been allowed to be on this cover.
Yeah, the cover is that good. (Dlisted also has a peek of the cover). So, what do you think of the cover? Does Lisa deserve criticism or the photographers who set up this garbage? Redbook and Good Housekeeping do stuff hotter than this!
One Response to “Lisa Rinna’s Playboy Cover is Disappointing”
We'd love to hear your comment but please don't spam, we reserve the right to delete anything which is inappropriate
Yes, ok, her face is kinda messed up from the plastic surgery but her body is still SMOKING in the May 2009 Playboy pics