Lindsay Lohan might have had naughty pictures stolen. It seems that shoes and jewelry aren’t the only things that were taken when Lindsay’s house was robbed. Lindsay appears to be freaking out a little because what was taken is really, really bad for her.
More pictures of Lindsay after the skip…
Lindsay apparently kept track of some pictures and video of herself enjoying some extra curricular activities. According to the Chicago Sun Times:
I’ve learned the real reason Lindsay Lohan is so upset about the theft of the safe from her L.A. house is the contents included some very incriminating videos and photos, plus legal documents, that LiLo believes could cause embarrassment if made public.
So what’s your guess on what Lindsay did? Drugs on tape? Sex? Something to break her probation and land her butt in jail? Whatever it is, if it is released to the public you know the person who did it will land in jail too. Maybe that’s why Lindsay called daddy-o first and not the cops. She was afraid of what was taken!
Photos: Bauer Griffin
8 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan Might Have Had Naughty Pictures Stolen”
We'd love to hear your comment but please don't spam, we reserve the right to delete anything which is inappropriate
[...] Lindsay Lohan burglar holding some naughty pics and video? – Anything Hollywood [...]
that girl is ridiculously gorgeous, she should star partying a bit slower tho
My guess is that just about everybody has some photos that they would not wish to be made public. The story says they were in a safe. Fodder for blackmail?
What concerns me is how something that has been stolen can be put out on the market. You need a release to publish most things especially if it is a commercial operation as opposed to say something used in a news story.
People have a right to privacy. Even people that are in the various fields of entertainment retain that right.
I guess the point to me is that if there are not some laws that prevent this kind of exploitation, we are all vulnerable to injury from anyone who take a whim to do some harm. Just about any phone can take a video or stills.
In response to Rigid’s comment:
It’s a sad legal state in this country (USA) that once a person achieves “celebrity” status, they no longer have the right to privacy. If “inquiring minds want to know” (why do you think a certain national “tabloid” uses this exact phrase?), then their private lives are “up for grabs” so to speak.
That was basically the judge’s ruling when the Pamela Anderson/ Tommy Lee sex tapes were being sold. These tapes were also stolen from a safe!
You know what..i am a big time supporter of Lindsay , Spears..and all the other Cel;ebs
Who gives a shit about who got them, how they got them or any other such BS. Lets see the pictures now, we all want to enjoy.
Maybe the tabloids should leave the actors/actresses alone and report on stuff that would help the american people. Start reporting on politicians, and all the corupt shit they do.
in response to ozimandias’s comment.
I agree inquiring minds do want to know, but the problem is most the people that inquire these tabloids can’t read. They buy the mags to look at the pictures. Celebrities that bust their buts to amuse us, get busted on, while people that make our laws, govern our states and rule our country go unnoticed.. ( GO FIGURE )