If you’re looking for KRISTEN STEWART‘s Glamour-ous missing arm, you aren’t likely to find it. The Photoshop has bandit struck again, and this time around, it walloped Kristen a hard one on the cover of Glamour magazine, effectively making her a cripple from her left bicep up. Wonder what Edward has to say about his sadly incomplete looking Bella…
Celebrity news is bewailing the prevalence of heavily Photoshopped celebrities on magazine covers, and if these severely digitally altered images are of women, who’s to say these misleading images won’t influence thousands, if not millions of young, impressionable girls who’d end up longing for missing chunks of thigh, waspy anatomically impossible waistlines, and in the case of Kristen, even missing arms.
*gasp* A nation of female teenagers with missing arms does paint a pretty gruesome picture.
Don’t we just wish the powers-that-be running publications like Glamour Magazine would rein in their art departments from over-zealously dismembering celebrities on their covers? It’s either that or include a disclaimer warning readers of the digital surgery they’ve so assiduously wrecked upon their models.
We think Kristen has the legal right to have all her arms intact on a magazine cover. Otherwise, don’t consumers have the right to know?
We'd love to hear your comment but please don't spam, we reserve the right to delete anything which is inappropriate
