Designer CAROLINA HERRERA has announced she will be selling replicas of Bella’s wedding dress from “Breaking Dawn, Part I” at CHNY boutiques so Twi-hards can experience their own fantasy of being married to hot vamp, Edward Cullen…
The dress, which Bella’s mother Renee described in the book as “gorgeous, graceful and elegant” like something “out of an Austen movie,” is made of shiny satin with a long line of pearl buttons down the back. “Twilight” author, Stephenie Meyer‘s idea of the dress was based on Bella’s engagement ring, an oval, diamond-encrusted piece said to have been owned by Edward’s mother back in the 1800′s. So expect the Carolina Herrera replicas of Bella’s dress to be very decadently turn-of-the-century…
Carolina Herrera was especially chosen by Meyer to design the white sheath wedding dress with a lace-embellished back to be custom-made for Kristen Stewart, who plays Bella.
“I wanted to create a magical moment that they had at the wedding,”
Herrera told Hollywood news.
“She’s an innocent girl that is finding her first true love, so there is romance, there is magic, there is everything together.”
So it comes as no surprise that Bella’s wedding gown design was as closely guarded as Kate’s Middleton‘s Alexander McQueen wedding dress, and was only revealed during the film’s $238.5 million opening in theaters over the weekend.
But if you’re unwilling to wait a few more seconds before scoring Bella’s dress, bridal company Alfred Angelo offers replicas of the dress retailing from $799 in select stores worldwide, so try not to trip all over yourselves, hmm?
Images via video screen grabs
One Response to “CAROLINA HERRERA To Start Selling Bella’s “Breaking Dawn” Wedding Dress”
We'd love to hear your comment but please don't spam, we reserve the right to delete anything which is inappropriate
“…been owned by Edward’s mother back in the 1800′s. So expect the Carolina Herrera replicas of Bella’s dress to be very decadently 18th century…”
You do realize that the 1800s are the 19th century, and the 18th century is the 1700s…. right?