John Edwards and Elizabeth Edwards have officially split. After long speculation that the philandering Edwards fathered Rielle Hunter‘s baby, the one-time presidential candidate admitted to being the infant’s father. The world waited for Elizabeth’s reponse and got it this afternoon — hit the road John!

more John after the hop…
North Carolina law requires that couples separate for a year before officially filing for divorce. So today marks the beginning of John and Elizabeth‘s separation. The split comes right before the release of the Edwards‘ tell-all, The Politician, by ex-aide Andrew Young. The AP reports:
John Edwards admits the kid with Rielle Hunter is his. It only took what, three years for John to fess up to his infidelities? John had the fling with Rielle when he was running for President. Can you imagine if he had been elected?

More news of John after the snap…
I guess John’s affair couldn’t be any worse than any other politician’s – except now the media is way more involved. Here’s what John said via the LA Times:
John Edwards can not shake lose the baby drama that is following him around. Maybe because it keeps changing and getting worse? Or maybe because he seems like such a hypocrite in light of things…
More pictures after the break…
John Edwards admitted his affair with Rielle Hunter, but denied her baby was his. The kinks in that story are as follows:
When Rielle was pregnant, she named one of Edwards’ aids as the father.
Senator John Edwards finally admits that he’s had an affair with Rielle Hunter after months of denial. He issued the following statements last Friday regarding his affair but he is denying being the father of Hunter’s baby girl as reports by TMZ:
more photos after the jump…
Senator John Edwards isn’t Hollywood, but he is of public interest since he was a Presidential candidate and a Vice President top pick. Especially after what news story broke about him!
More pictures after the jump…
The married Senator was in California to discuss homelessness in LA. The National Enquirer had a reporter near the hotel where he was going for a ‘meeting’ because they knew he was meeting a mistress. How? I don’t know. I know the Enquirer doesn’t have the best reputation…but this story seems pretty credible. And how would they make up these details?






















